Policiales

Cecilia's femicide: the preventive detention of César Sena and the accused were confirmed

The Superior Court rejected the appeals presented by the defendants and the magistrates considered that there are elements to consider that the youngest of the children was a co-author of the femicide of his wife, while the rest acted as accessories.

  • 01/11/2023 • 06:44

The Superior Court of Justice (STJ) of Chaco confirmed the preventive detention of César Sena and four collaborators of his family, in the context of the case for the femicide of Cecilia Strzyzowski (28), missing since June 2 in the city of Resistance, judicial sources reported. The preventive detentions dictated by the Special Prosecutor's Team (EFE) formed to intervene in the case and ratified by the Criminal and Correctional Appeals Chamber, were now confirmed by the Second Chamber of the STJ, which rejected the appeals presented by the defenders of César Sena , Fabiana González, José Gustavo Obregón, Griselda Reinoso and Gustavo Melgarejo. At the time of rejecting the appeals, the magistrates considered that there are elements in this procedural instance to consider that the minor of the Sena clan was a co-author of the femicide of his wife - along with his parents, Marcela Acuña and Emerenciano Sena -, while the remaining three They acted as cover-ups. The members of the STJ also supported the decision that all of them remain in prison, believing that there is a risk of escape and hindering the investigation. "Within this context, it is not seen that the attacked decision-maker and in the procedural stage in which it is dictated, has incorrectly applied or interpreted the procedural law nor that it can be classified as arbitrary, since it adequately exposes the foundations on which it is based and "They do not appear to be devoid of content, and the inaccuracy of their arguments has not been demonstrated, which is why the articulated appeal must be considered a mere discrepancy between the appellants and the resolution, which lacks the capacity to cause its annulment." , the judges wrote when rejecting the defenses' appeals.